Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Philip's avatar

Kristaps, generally your posts are very biased and structured in a way to prove your overall thesis that all P2P is crap, but this one beats them all. Whole setup and timing is severely biased. I will explain why.

1. Too short term. P2P is not cash account in bank - so making experiment for only 2 months with loans with 60 days buyback and cashing out 100% before loans being repaid or bought back is just something you do to prove some thesis you are aiming at.

2. You are setting example with getting a loan with 51% annual interest?!? - of course it will go wrong. Who gets leverage at 50%?!?

3. Cashing out at the worst possible moment.

Don't get me wrong me - I totally support the idea that getting a loan to invest in loans is majorly stupid and many things can go wrong especially for average Joe that thinks P2P is safe investment.

But for such an experiment to be concise and have any valid conclusions I think that it needs to be setup in a totally different way:

1. At least 1 year

2. Get widely available consumer loan at 3-5%

3. Cash out only as much as needed to cover the loan repayments.

4. See what is left at the end of the year.

As you would like to put this guide with the banner - Prove me wrong

Expand full comment
Gary Le Crowdlender's avatar

I have a draft post in my blog about borrowing to invest.

I intended to take a 1 year loan, invest it until the end of the loan, and use some of my own money to pay back the loan. I intended to make a profit a year later, at the end of the loan.

I reach conclusion number 2 : too much hassle for too little profit.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts